Woohookitty 08:57, 3 September 2005 (UTC) We "need" to do what is best, and modify the rest of Wikipedia as necessary. → Vik Reykja 08:52, 3 September 2005 (UTC) In keeping with the rest of Wikipedia, we need to keep it as by franchise, Montreal/Washington included. I would certainly vote for the separation of Montréal Expos and Washington Nationals (and in fact, I have) but is there enough on the Brooklyn Dodgers or New York Giants to merit articles separate from LAD and SFG? That seems more important to me than robotic break-downs. I vote by city.- CrazyTalk 05:41, Septem(UTC)Īs with anything on Wikipedia, I would say it depends on how much information is available. They currently are broken up by franchise, but that seems to be ruffling some feathers in Montreal (and Cleveland in the NFL). Who thinks the teams should be broken up by city rather than franchise? By city I mean having separate (but equal) entries for the Browns and the Orioles, for Brooklyn and LA, etc.
#CRAZYTALK 8 GEORGE WASHINGTOM ANDROID#
android 79 23:34, Septem(UTC) Teams by city or by franchise? There's currently only three active editors, and we're not exactly going nuts with it yet. CrazyTalk 21:24, Septem(UTC) I'll probably just merge the projects together. Otherwise, it seems like merging the 2 projects would not diminish the integrity of either one, but it might mean making one a subproject of the other. Putting links on the 2 pages to each other might help if you wanted to keep the projects separate. If you're interested, check it out – that project could almost be subsumed into this one. There's also Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball players, which I have attempted to restart, to little avail.
#CRAZYTALK 8 GEORGE WASHINGTOM SERIES#
62 I-55 Series nominated for Good Article Status.47 Additional information in MLB team templates.43 Category:Major League Baseball regular seasons.33 Amateur baseball in the United States.28 2006 Baseball steroids investigation.
20 SABR, Sabermatrics & Sabermatricians.15 Statistics template for player pages?/Shiny Logos.
0 kommentar(er)
